DASS-42
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (42-item Full Form)
The full 42-item self-report measure of depression, anxiety, and stress with three 14-item subscales. Provides more detailed assessment than the DASS-21.
Administer the DASS-42 to your clients
This assessment isn't available for public self-scoring. Registered practitioners can administer, score, and report on it inside Grounded Scribe.
Sample report
Example of the report delivered to practitioners when this assessment is administered inside Grounded Scribe. Fictional data.
Download sample (PDF)Licensing & Attribution
Source
Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1995). Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia.
License
The DASS is available for clinical and research use. Scores must not be made available to respondents. Results fed back to clinician only. Scales may not be modified or sold for profit.
Terms of Use
Free for individual clinical and educational use. See our Terms of Service.
What is the DASS-42?
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales — 42 Item Version (DASS-42) is the original full-length self-report instrument developed by Professors Syd H. Lovibond and Peter F. Lovibond. The DASS-42 measures three distinct but related negative emotional states: depression (14 items), anxiety (14 items), and stress (14 items).
Each item is scored from 0 ("Did not apply to me at all") to 3 ("Applied to me very much or most of the time"), covering the past week. Subscale scores range from 0 to 42 for each of the three dimensions. The DASS-42 provides the most comprehensive assessment within the DASS family of instruments.
Development and Validation
The DASS-42 emerged from a sustained program of research by Lovibond and Lovibond aimed at developing measures that would cleanly separate depression from anxiety at the self-report level. Using confirmatory factor analysis across large samples, they identified a tripartite structure comprising depression, anxiety, and a third factor termed "stress" (reflecting chronic non-specific arousal and tension).
Published in 1995, the DASS-42 demonstrated excellent internal consistency across all three subscales (Cronbach's alphas typically exceeding 0.90). The three-factor structure has been replicated across diverse populations, age groups, and languages.
The 14 items per subscale provide greater measurement precision and content coverage compared to the shorter DASS-21. This additional detail can be valuable in clinical contexts where a thorough assessment of each dimension is desired. The DASS-42 is particularly suited to detailed clinical assessment, while the DASS-21 may be preferred for routine screening or repeated administration where respondent burden is a consideration.
How DASS-42 Scoring Works
The DASS-42 uses the same four-point scale as the DASS-21, covering the past week:
0 = Did not apply to me at all 1 = Applied to me to some degree, or some of the time 2 = Applied to me to a considerable degree or a good part of the time 3 = Applied to me very much or most of the time
Each subscale has 14 items, and scores are summed directly (no multiplication needed, unlike the DASS-21). Subscale scores range from 0 to 42.
Published severity labels for DASS-42 subscale scores are:
Depression: Normal (0-9), Mild (10-13), Moderate (14-20), Severe (21-27), Extremely Severe (28+) Anxiety: Normal (0-7), Mild (8-9), Moderate (10-14), Severe (15-19), Extremely Severe (20+) Stress: Normal (0-14), Mild (15-18), Moderate (19-25), Severe (26-33), Extremely Severe (34+)
These are the same cut-off values used for the multiplied DASS-21 subscale scores, as the DASS-21 multiplication is designed to produce equivalent ranges.
Clinical Applications
The DASS-42 is used in clinical and research settings for comprehensive assessment of depression, anxiety, and stress. Its 14 items per subscale provide richer content coverage than the DASS-21, capturing a broader range of symptom expressions within each domain.
The Depression subscale items cover dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest, anhedonia, and inertia. The Anxiety subscale addresses autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety, and subjective anxious affect. The Stress subscale assesses difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, irritability, agitation, and impatience.
The DASS-42 is particularly suitable for initial comprehensive assessments, research requiring maximum measurement precision, and clinical contexts where detailed subscale profiles inform case formulation. For ongoing monitoring where brevity is important, the DASS-21 may be a more practical alternative.
As with all DASS instruments, scores should be interpreted by a qualified practitioner as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment. The DASS-42 is a severity and screening measure, not a diagnostic tool.
DASS-42 in Australian Practice
As the original DASS instrument developed in Australia, the DASS-42 has a strong heritage in Australian clinical research and practice. Australian normative data from the original development studies provide a locally validated reference for score interpretation.
The DASS-42 is used in Australian psychology, psychiatry, primary care, and counselling services. Its comprehensive coverage makes it a popular choice for detailed clinical assessments, research protocols, and service evaluation projects.
Under the DASS licensing terms, scores are intended to be communicated to respondents through a qualified practitioner rather than displayed directly during unsupervised self-completion. This ensures scores are interpreted within appropriate clinical context.
While the shorter DASS-21 has become more widely used in routine clinical practice due to its brevity, the DASS-42 remains the instrument of choice when maximum psychometric detail is required.
Use the DASS-42 inside Grounded Scribe
Registered practitioners can administer the DASS-42 to clients, track scores across sessions, and auto-document results into clinical notes.
Why this isn't a public self-scoring tool
- •The authors of this assessment restrict public self-administration. We respect that request.
- •Scores from this instrument are not diagnostic on their own. They are designed to be interpreted alongside clinical history, presentation, and other measures by a qualified practitioner.
- •The assessment was developed for use within a care relationship. The practitioner-client context is part of how it was designed to work.
- •Elevated scores without clinical support can cause harm. Placing the instrument behind the practitioner workflow helps ensure results are delivered alongside appropriate care.
Registered practitioners can administer, score, and report on this assessment inside Grounded Scribe. Register to get started →
Frequently Asked Questions About the DASS-42
Related Clinical Calculators
Other validated instruments commonly used alongside the DASS-42.
DASS-21
Stress
A 21-item self-report measure of depression, anxiety, and stress with three 7-item subscales
CalculateDASS-Y
Child & Adolescent
A 21-item youth adaptation (ages 8-17) of the DASS measuring depression, anxiety, and stress with simplified language for younger respondents.
CalculateSend all of these bundled to your client
One link, multiple assessments completed in sequence — auto-scored back to you.
References
- Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1995.
- Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176-181.
- Crawford JR, Henry JD. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003;42(2):111-131.
- Crawford JR, Cayley C, Lovibond PF, Wilson PH, Hartley C. Percentile norms and accompanying interval estimates from an Australian general adult population sample for self-report mood scales (BAI, BDI, CRSD, CES-D, DASS, DASS-21, STAI-X, STAI-Y, SRDS, and SRAS). Aust Psychol. 2011;46(1):3-14. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2010.00003.x.
Last updated: