Skip to content
  • Trauma & PTSD

ACE Calculator

Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire

10-item screening for adverse childhood experiences (before age 18)

Take the ACE

Free scoring calculator with instant results.

  • 10 items
  • ~5 minutes
  • Score range: 0–10

No data stored. Scoring happens in your browser.

By using this tool you agree to our Terms of Service.

Unlimited on every paid plan →

What is the ACE Questionnaire?

The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire is a ten-item retrospective screening tool that assesses exposure to adverse experiences during childhood (before age 18). Developed as part of the landmark ACE Study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente, the questionnaire covers three categories of childhood adversity: abuse (emotional, physical, sexual), neglect (emotional, physical), and household dysfunction (domestic violence, substance abuse, mental illness, parental separation, incarcerated household member).

Each item is answered with "Yes" (1) or "No" (0), producing a total score between 0 and 10. The ACE score represents a cumulative count of different types of adverse experiences, not the frequency or severity of any single experience.

The ACE Study and Its Impact

The original ACE Study, published by Felitti and colleagues in 1998, surveyed over 17,000 adults at Kaiser Permanente in San Diego. The findings revealed a striking dose-response relationship between the number of adverse childhood experiences and a wide range of negative health outcomes in adulthood.

Key findings included that ACEs are remarkably common: approximately two-thirds of participants reported at least one ACE, and more than one in five reported three or more. The study demonstrated graded relationships between ACE scores and outcomes including heart disease, cancer, chronic lung disease, liver disease, depression, substance use, and premature mortality.

The ACE Study has become one of the most cited and influential public health studies, fundamentally shifting understanding of the relationship between childhood adversity and lifelong health. It has informed trauma-informed care models worldwide and has been replicated in numerous countries, including Australia.

How ACE Scoring Works

The ACE Questionnaire uses a simple binary format. Each of the ten items asks about a specific category of adverse experience before age 18:

Yes = 1 (experienced this type of adversity) No = 0 (did not experience this type of adversity)

Total scores range from 0 to 10. The original Felitti & Anda (1998) ACE Study did not publish graduated severity bands. The widely-cited threshold anchored to the published dose-response finding is:

0–3: Below the ≥4 threshold commonly cited in the ACE Study as associated with substantially elevated health risk 4–10: At or above the ≥4 threshold (Felitti & Anda, 1998) — research shows substantially elevated risk across depression, substance use, cardiovascular disease, and other outcomes

This is a population-level statistical finding, not an individual prediction. Two individuals with the same ACE score may have had vastly different experiences.

Use the ACE inside Grounded Scribe

Registered practitioners can administer the ACE to clients, track scores across sessions, and auto-document results into clinical notes.

The Assessments screen: 33 tools, scored for you, ready to send (demo data)

Clinical Considerations

The ACE Questionnaire is used in clinical settings to support trauma-informed assessment and care planning. Understanding a person's ACE history can help practitioners contextualise current presentations within a developmental and relational framework.

Important considerations when using the ACE Questionnaire include:

The ACE score is a count of types of adversity, not a measure of severity. Two individuals with the same ACE score may have had vastly different experiences.

The ACE Questionnaire does not capture all forms of childhood adversity. Experiences such as bullying, racism, community violence, poverty, and foster care are not included in the original ten items.

Protective factors (such as supportive relationships, community connection, and personal resilience) are not measured by the ACE Questionnaire but significantly moderate the impact of adverse experiences.

The ACE Questionnaire asks about sensitive topics and should be administered in the context of a therapeutic relationship where appropriate support is available.

ACE Research in Australia

Australian research has confirmed and substantially extended the patterns identified in the original US ACE Study. The 2023 Australian Child Maltreatment Study (ACMS) — led by Haslam, Mathews, Pacella, Higgins, Finkelhor and colleagues at Queensland University of Technology — surveyed a nationally representative sample of 8,503 Australians aged 16 and over, providing the first nationally representative prevalence data on child maltreatment in Australia.

Key Australian findings from the ACMS include:

62.2% of Australians experienced at least one form of child maltreatment before age 18 39.4% experienced multiple forms (multi-type maltreatment) Physical abuse: 32.0%; sexual abuse: 28.5%; emotional abuse: 30.9%; neglect: 8.9%; exposure to domestic violence: 39.6% Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians report disproportionately high rates of cumulative adversity

These prevalence figures are substantially higher than the original Felitti & Anda (1998) US ACE Study findings, reflecting both the broader maltreatment definitions used in the ACMS and the methodological strengths of a nationally representative population sample.

In clinical practice, the ACE Questionnaire is used in Australian psychology, general practice, social work, and community health settings. It supports trauma-informed approaches to care and can assist practitioners in understanding the developmental context of a person's current difficulties.

Australian guidelines emphasise that ACE screening should always be accompanied by appropriate clinical response, including safety assessment, psychoeducation about trauma, and referral pathways where needed. Where culturally appropriate, alternative or supplementary trauma-screening tools developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations should be considered.

Frequently Asked Questions About the ACE

Is the ACE Questionnaire free to use?

Yes. The ACE Questionnaire was developed by the CDC and Kaiser Permanente and is in the public domain. It can be used without permission or licensing fees.

What does an ACE score of 4 or above mean?

An ACE score of 4 or above has been associated with significantly increased risk for various health outcomes at the population level. However, an individual ACE score does not predict any specific outcome. Many people with high ACE scores lead healthy lives, and protective factors play an important role.

See how outcome charting works →
Can the ACE Questionnaire be used with children?

The original ACE Questionnaire is retrospective, designed for adults reflecting on childhood experiences. Modified versions have been developed for use with adolescents. For children currently experiencing adversity, other screening tools and clinical assessment approaches are more appropriate.

Does the ACE score predict individual health outcomes?

No. The dose-response relationships found in ACE research are population-level statistical findings. An individual ACE score does not predict specific outcomes for that person. Many factors influence health, including protective factors, resilience, and access to support.

See how outcome charting works →
What are the limitations of the ACE Questionnaire?

The ACE Questionnaire captures only ten specific types of adversity and does not include experiences such as bullying, racism, poverty, community violence, or war exposure. It also does not measure frequency, severity, timing, or duration of adverse experiences, and does not assess protective factors.

See automated scoring inside Grounded Scribe →
Should everyone be screened with the ACE Questionnaire?

Universal ACE screening remains debated. Proponents argue it supports trauma-informed care; critics note the risk of retraumatisation, the limitations of the measure, and the need for adequate clinical response systems. Australian guidelines recommend that screening be conducted within an appropriate clinical relationship with follow-up support available.

Auto-document results into your notes →

Related Clinical Calculators

Other validated instruments commonly used alongside the ACE.

Send all of these bundled to your clientOne link, multiple assessments completed in sequence — auto-scored back to you.

References

  1. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245-258.
  2. Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356-e366.
  3. Haslam DM, Lawrence DM, Mathews B, Higgins DJ, Hunt A, Scott JG, Dunne MP, Erskine HE, Thomas HJ, Finkelhor D, Pacella R, et al. The Australian Child Maltreatment Study (ACMS), a national survey of the prevalence of child maltreatment and its correlates: methodology. Med J Aust. 2023;218(Suppl 6):S5-S12. doi:10.5694/mja2.51869.
  4. Merrick MT, Ford DC, Ports KA, et al. Vital signs: estimated proportion of adult health problems attributable to adverse childhood experiences. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(44):999-1005.

← View all free clinical tools

Start Documenting in Minutes. Not Hours.

Free plan. No credit card. Cancel anytime.

Last updated: