Summary
NDIS plan reassessment reports answer one structural question: should the participant's funding continue, increase, decrease, or change shape? Decision-makers look for clear evidence of progress toward goals, identification of continuing functional need, and a justified service plan for the next plan period. Reports that simply describe activity without addressing those three points often result in reduced funding.
Report structure
- Participant identification and plan period — name, NDIS number, date of birth, current plan dates.
- Service summary — services delivered this plan period, hours, type, location.
- Goal review — for each plan goal: stated goal, baseline status, current status, progress evidence.
- Functional capacity update — the six NDIS domains (mobility, communication, social interaction, learning, self-care, self-management). Where capacity has changed, document the change with measurable evidence.
- Continuing functional need — what is still required and why.
- Recommended supports — what, how often, for how long, with cost rationale.
- Reasonable and necessary justification — explicit reference to the s 34 test (effective and beneficial, value for money, related to disability, takes into account informal supports, most appropriate to fund through NDIS).
- Risk of plan reduction — articulating what would happen if supports were reduced.
Goal-progress documentation
For each goal, present:
- The goal as worded in the plan.
- The baseline measurement (date, source).
- The current measurement (date, source).
- The narrative of progress, plateau, or regression.
- The next-period goal, if continuing.
Functional capacity update
Use a domain-by-domain table where possible. NDIA decision-makers triage at this level.
| Domain | Last plan baseline | Current status | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility | Indoor mobility with rollator, fatigues at 50m | Indoor mobility with rollator, 75m before fatigue | Modest improvement |
| Communication | Single-word level | 2–3 word phrases, plus AAC | Improvement |
Reasonable and necessary
Each recommended support must be tied to the s 34 criteria. The report does not have to recite the section, but each support listed should be defensible against each criterion.
Common failure modes
- "Continued therapy as per plan" — no goal progress detail.
- Goals listed but not measured.
- Recommended hours unchanged from last plan with no rationale either way.
- Functional capacity domains not addressed.
- No statement of risk if supports reduced.
Related reading
How we review this guide
Library guides reference original Australian source authorities — not secondary commentary — and are updated when source material changes. Each guide cites the regulator, item descriptor, or governing standard it draws from so you can verify it directly.
- Sources checked
- • NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission
- Review cadence
- Reviewed annually and whenever a cited source authority publishes a material change. Last reviewed .
- Not advice
- Reference content for Australian practitioners and education staff. Not legal, clinical, or billing advice — verify against your governing body and current source documents.
Keywords: ndis plan reassessment report, ndis review report allied health, ndis plan renewal documentation, ndis goal progress report, ndis reasonable necessary justification
Keep reading
More on guides
Free, evergreen reference for Australian practitioners and school staff.
BrowseTry a free tool
Free assessment calculators
Score 33+ standardised assessments online. Download a PDF report. No account needed.
Open the toolsTry Grounded Scribe
Spend less time on documentation
AI drafts compliant clinical notes from your dictation or recording. Free tier — no card.
Start freeWas this article helpful?
Related Articles
Continue exploring related topics
Paediatric ADHD Diagnostic Reports: A Structure for Australian Clinicians
ADHD diagnostic reports for paediatricians and psychologists must satisfy DSM-5-TR criteria, exclude alternative explanations, and provide enough detail to support school adjustments and (where applicable) PBS prescribing. This guide outlines a defensible report structure.
Developmental Coordination Disorder Assessment Reports: A Documentation Guide
DCD diagnostic reports prepared by occupational therapists and paediatricians must satisfy DSM-5-TR criteria and provide enough functional detail to support school adjustments and (where applicable) NDIS funding. This guide outlines the report structure.
Childhood Apraxia of Speech Assessment Reports: A Speech Pathology Guide
Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) diagnostic reports must reference the three core features identified by ASHA, document the assessment battery, and provide enough detail for the report to support school adjustments and NDIS funding requests.