Summary
NDIS Functional Capacity Assessment (FCA) reports serve two purposes: providing access evidence under s 24 (or early intervention under s 25) and informing the size and shape of supports in the participant's plan. A defensible FCA names the assessment tools used, addresses the six functional domains, and ties findings to specific support recommendations.
The two-purpose framing
- Access evidence — does the participant meet the disability or early-intervention requirements?
- Planning evidence — what supports are reasonable and necessary?
Some reports are commissioned for one purpose only; many are commissioned for both. The structure adapts but the core sections are common.
Standard structure
- Identifying information, referrer, purpose.
- Background — diagnoses, history, current supports.
- Sources — interview, observation, standardised assessments, file review, collateral.
- Standardised assessments — named, scored, interpreted (commonly: WHODAS 2.0, AMPS, Vineland-3, COPM, FIM).
- Functional capacity by NDIS domain:
- Mobility
- Communication
- Social interaction
- Learning
- Self-care
- Self-management
For each domain: current capacity, supports currently used, capacity with and without support, change over time, prognosis.
- Disability impact — how the impairment(s) affect functional capacity.
- Permanence statement (s 24) or early-intervention case (s 25).
- Recommended supports — type, frequency, duration, cost rationale.
- Goal-aligned outcomes — what would change with the recommended supports.
- Limitations and reviewer-reading notes.
Domain-level detail
NDIA planners read by domain. Each domain section should include:
- A baseline narrative.
- The standardised score(s) with interpretation.
- Specific examples of capacity (e.g. "Showers independently in a step-in shower with rails; cannot transfer in/out of a bath; requires verbal prompting to apply soap").
- The supports currently in place.
- The supports recommended.
Vague domain descriptions ("communication is difficult") do not size supports.
Related reading
How we review this guide
Library guides reference original Australian source authorities — not secondary commentary — and are updated when source material changes. Each guide cites the regulator, item descriptor, or governing standard it draws from so you can verify it directly.
- Sources checked
- • NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission
- Review cadence
- Reviewed annually and whenever a cited source authority publishes a material change. Last reviewed .
- Not advice
- Reference content for Australian practitioners and education staff. Not legal, clinical, or billing advice — verify against your governing body and current source documents.
Keywords: ndis functional capacity assessment, fca report ndis ot, ndis access report allied health, ndis section 24 25 evidence, ndis disability evidence report
Keep reading
More on guides
Free, evergreen reference for Australian practitioners and school staff.
BrowseTry a free tool
Free assessment calculators
Score 33+ standardised assessments online. Download a PDF report. No account needed.
Open the toolsTry Grounded Scribe
Spend less time on documentation
AI drafts compliant clinical notes from your dictation or recording. Free tier — no card.
Start freeWas this article helpful?
Related Articles
Continue exploring related topics
Paediatric ADHD Diagnostic Reports: A Structure for Australian Clinicians
ADHD diagnostic reports for paediatricians and psychologists must satisfy DSM-5-TR criteria, exclude alternative explanations, and provide enough detail to support school adjustments and (where applicable) PBS prescribing. This guide outlines a defensible report structure.
Developmental Coordination Disorder Assessment Reports: A Documentation Guide
DCD diagnostic reports prepared by occupational therapists and paediatricians must satisfy DSM-5-TR criteria and provide enough functional detail to support school adjustments and (where applicable) NDIS funding. This guide outlines the report structure.
Childhood Apraxia of Speech Assessment Reports: A Speech Pathology Guide
Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) diagnostic reports must reference the three core features identified by ASHA, document the assessment battery, and provide enough detail for the report to support school adjustments and NDIS funding requests.